|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Disaster Recovery Strategies
|
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:01:29 -0400
David Richardson <dgr24@drexel.edu> wrote:
> I have a linux machine that I would like to be able to completely
> restore to its current configuration in the event of a hard drive
> failure. I'd like to be able to just pop in a new hard drive, and have
> it magically work like the old one without the need to manually install
> or configure software.
>
> I was thinking about just using dd to copy the entire hard drive on the
> currently working machine to a file and then if I ever need to put in a
> new drive just using dd to write the contents of the old drive onto the
> new drive. Is it a problem if the new drive is a different size than
> the old? Or does anyone have a suggest of a better way?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
Hi
DD: I wouldnt dd an entire disk, it could be dependent on the disk geometry
(better make sure the disks have the exact geometry). how about
dd just the partitions.
the downside is how often do you want to dd the disk.
software raid: I think is a good idea. You dont even have to have the same
disks. For example, software raid level 1:
80 gigs 120 gigs size example device
partition1 partition1 40gigs /dev/md0
parition2 partition2 20gigs /dev/md1
partition3 partition3 20 gigs /dev/md2
parition 4 swap swap
partition5 60 gigs /dev/hdg5
something like this is possible (in the above example
you dont need to protect swap or hdg5, for example
/dev/hdg5 might be /tmp). in fact this is what i did
on my home server till i got tired of it and reverted back
to non-raid (long story). or you could just put exact
same disks and do a raid level 1 on them--note that
software raid works with partitions (not disks).
in the event of one drive failing, you'll need to partiton
the replacement disk similar to the old one, probably
configure the raid setup again (i dont remember exactly),
and reinsert the new disk (raidhotadd, I think). There is
still some work to do, but fortunately your data will still
be surviving on one or the other disk.
if your doing software raid, and if you have IDE, its best to
put the disks each on its own cable (master/slave for raid
components is not recomended). so a separate inexepensive
ide controller is a good idea.
This wont protect you from errors (e.g. if you delete files
accidentaly the raid disks will do it faithfully), only
from media failures--replace one or the other disk at
signs of drives failing.
jondz
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|