Howard Bloom on 13 Sep 2004 18:36:02 -0000 |
________________________________ From: plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org [mailto:plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org] On Behalf Of George Gallen Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 1:40 PM To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org Subject: RE: [PLUG] More critique of Linux desktop I missed most of the fun chatter on this... But, in a business setting, switching OS's should have a financial motivation. Just because the OS is free and/or open source isn't enough, if you have to spend hours yourself and/or pay someone else to retool the new OS. If Windows is doing the job, and doing it adequately...great. when it stops doing it adequately, then you need to look into an alternative, whether it's a different MS OS, or not. Linux is great for some things, and terrible for others Windows is great for some things, and terrible for lots of others Point being, I don't either will put either out of the market each OS has it's faults that allow the other a niche. Best of both worlds is running two networks, windows and linux George My problem with windows is how fragile an OS it really is. Not so much on the server side - as I build damn good hardened Windows Servers, but more so on the desktop. I have reinstalled my Office Desktop 4 times this year. It took me a while to figure out but it was getting hosed by an old Future Domain SCSI card I was using that probably isn't on the compatibility list, but the last time it was ruined was by the new version of ACT! Itself which didn't like the combination of SQL and my encrypted hard drives. To me, Linux offers more stability and that is important to me. It is certainly stable in the server realm. Howard ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|