Jesus Arocho on 13 Sep 2004 21:36:02 -0000 |
Darn, I wish technical questions would trigger this kind of passionate response! On Monday 13 September 2004 16:40, Ed Martin wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org > [mailto:plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org] On Behalf Of Howard Bloom > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:47 PM > To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org > Subject: RE: [PLUG] More critique of Linux desktop > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org > [mailto:plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Rivell > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:21 PM > To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org > Subject: Re: [PLUG] More critique of Linux desktop > > On Monday 13 September 2004 02:45 pm, M.Simons wrote: > > > I have reinstalled my Office Desktop 4 times this year. It took me > > > a while To me, Linux offers more stability and that is important to > > > me. It is certainly stable in the server realm. > > > > So then, in essence, what you are saying is that Windows isn't ready > > for the desktop. > > HAHAHAHAHA. Thats about what I was saying a couple days ago. My uncles > for > one love Linux on their desktop. Granted they only listen to music, view > video, read e-mail, and browse the web. I'm trying to hook them up into > the world of RSS feeds currently :) > > ------------------ > > This is the point I made at the very beginning of this voluminous thread. > Desktop Linux is wonderful if your expectations are not high. It excels in > doing a fine job for basic work on less of a machine and less memory. > > I put Linux on discarded computers from clients and give them away to > College Students who cannot afford them and also the PAL - that's Police > Athletic League - kids who can't afford a computer. Someone's trash has > just become a kid's computer and works great. > > It just seems to me that so many who have responded to this thread, have > taken the fact that Linux is not ready for mainstream use on the desktop, > very personally and I don't know why. > > Am I insulting you with the truth? > > Howard > > Actually I thought being called a Nuts Zealots Kooks was offensive. And I > also run a consulting business and have been for the last seven years. I > think you are a narrow minded user. If you where really solutions driven > you would be finding ways to get your clients away from being a target to > mainstream virus/ worm programmers. > > Since you pointed out that there are no programs to replace Act! I > corresponded with a few folks and it seems a similar CRM package could > possibly put together with off the shelf open source components. > This is called doing something about it and not being a spectator. > Spectators watch and complain when you lose. Doers get it done. > > I am taking the high road and I'm going to do something about it. Because > that is what this group is for. I invite you to help if you can put you > pessimism beside and look for a solution. > > If not then please don't respond I really do not need anyone bringing me > down when I'm trying to find solutions to issues at hand. > > Ed Martin > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|