| Jeff Abrahamson on 22 Oct 2004 11:54:02 -0000 |
|
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 07:06:33AM -0400, Tobias DiPasquale wrote: > [34 lines, 156 words, 1271 characters] Top characters: _asioen- > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Oct 21, 2004, at 11:57 PM, Doug Crompton wrote: > > How does DSPAM differ from Spamassassin? > > DSPAM is the most advanced Bayesian analysis filter for spam > categorization available today, bar none. It is also orders of > magnitude faster than SpamAssassin. You can make heuristics with a > combination of iptables and your LDA, but DSPAM was designed to do > per-account Bayesian for domains, so I think it will work just fine for > you. Check it out here: > > http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/ > > Alternatively, if the setup of DSPAM is too complex for you, you can > use bogofilter for the same purpose but be warned: it is worse and has > less features than DSPAM. I just checked the dspam web site. It looks pretty good. I've been using bogofilter with essentially no false positives (that I've found ;-) for the better part of a year. I get a dozen or two false negatives a day, though. I see 50 or so positives a day that I scan each morning. I am running bogofilter with a database of 23,272 spams and 43034 non-spam messages. Alas, dspam is not currently in debian testing, so my trying it will have to wait for a slightly bigger time slot than it would if I could apt-get it. But thanks for the URL and the recommendation. -- Jeff Jeff Abrahamson <http://www.purple.com/jeff/> +1 215/837-2287 GPG fingerprint: 1A1A BA95 D082 A558 A276 63C6 16BF 8C4C 0D1D AE4B A cool book of games, highly worth checking out: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1931686963/purple-20 Attachment:
signature.asc
|
|