sean finney on 2 Dec 2004 20:41:02 -0000 |
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:58:48AM -0500, George Gallen wrote: > no, actually, in this sense, I meant bypassed. > I assume that the gadget transforms figerprints > to a number, and how unique would that number > be vs using a password system. well, it would probably not be just a number, i imagine it would be a series of 2 dimensional coordinates and various descriptive feature code. in any case it would certainly be circumventable, but there isn't a system that is 100% secure, and it might be an overall improvement over a password based system. as far as whether it could be done in linux, it wouldn't be too hard to write a graphical login program and pam module to do this, *assuming you could get the device to actually work under linux*. sean Attachment:
signature.asc
|
|