Ben Dugan on 26 Jan 2005 13:43:43 -0000 |
It's been a while since I played with any of this... But aren't good halftone screens, by definition, device dependent? Yes, I think that's true. I wanted to see exageratedly large halftone cells on my system as a way of knowing that I'd got the right stuff in my file. Then I'd planned to set the cell size, spot function, etc., to reasonable values for the printer. I always run over to Don Lancaster's Hardware Guru stuff when I need I stumbled on Don Lancaster's page two days ago when searching and was really impressed with the amount of stuff there on postscript. I always think postscript is really cool, so its fun to see that some other people seem to think so, too. The "film resolution" is 2540 dpi: this is being sent to a print service place that uses an imagesetter. The film produces very high density blacks and very low absorbance clears. These are normally used as orginals to expose plates for high volume offset printing. In my case I want the film for use in a gray scale shaft-encoder kind of application. After starting to get the feeling that the halftones were going to be determined by the device, I called the printer and asked him about this. It sounds like the printer will interpret the postscript grays I send them and make its own screen or halftones as needed. So my wanting to see the halftones myself is probably just a bad instinct that wasted a bunch of time!
Thanks very much for your pointers! Ben
|
|