Jeff Abrahamson on 10 May 2005 01:29:38 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] gpg "buffer shorter than subpacket"


On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:32:18PM -0400, Michael C. Toren wrote:
>   [22 lines, 102 words, 1123 characters]  Top characters: _eniosra
> 
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:24:51PM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> > Any ideas what this means?  Google searching suggests it means a
> > corrupted key ring, but doesn't suggest why or what to do about it.
> 
> You could always revert to the backup public ring gpg maintains at
> ~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg~, then step through the process of re-fetching
> each of the keys you downloaded to determine which one broke your
> ring...

Good idea.  Actually, the backup had been corrupted too, apparently,
but I pulled a copy of my backup disk image, it worked great, even
after doing a --refresh.

The corruption followed ctrl-C'ing a refresh.  Oh, well.  Something
odd happened.

Thanks for the good suggestion.

-- 
 Jeff

 Jeff Abrahamson  <http://www.purple.com/jeff/>    +1 215/837-2287
 GPG fingerprint: 1A1A BA95 D082 A558 A276  63C6 16BF 8C4C 0D1D AE4B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug