|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
We have a customer using RHEL and we use White Box Linux in our
test environment to avoid the licensing. There's also CentOS and Tao
Linux which do the same thing (that is, strip the logos and otherwise
rebuild a distro from the RHEL source RPMs). The problem with Fedora is
that those releases have a pretty short duration of support (though a
couple of developers here go with Fedora, and just keep up with the
periodic FC releases).
Aaron
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Ron Kaye Jr wrote:
> Our curriculum calls for upgrading from RedHat 9 to Fedora Core.
> What version do YOU recommend? FC3? Is FC4 bleeding edge?
>
> I may be wrong, but RedHat pricing seemed cost prohibitive,
> negating an advantage.
> Has Fedora Core been a successful parallel enterprise?
> Is anyone using this in business/industry?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron Kaye
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|