rekaye1005 on 12 May 2005 17:34:37 -0000 |
Tom: Its ITT Tech. There are many schools throughout the country. Things change very slowly. So, for stability/support purposes, FC3 or some FC4 version? Stuff never changed so quickly in the Novell, Microsoft worlds. I have SUSE 9.x from a Novell promo, which I will get around to, But just for personal reasons, among them being I am a Novell expert. Thanks for your help Ron -----Original Message----- From: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org [mailto:plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org] On Behalf Of Tom Diehl Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:54 AM To: Ron Kaye Jr; Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List Subject: [PLUG] Re: fedora On Wed, 11 May 2005, Ron Kaye Jr wrote: > Our curriculum calls for upgrading from RedHat 9 to Fedora Core. > What version do YOU recommend? FC3? Is FC4 bleeding edge? FC4Test3 was just released on this past Tuesday, so yes, it is bleeding edge. Having said that I have been tracking rawhide quite successfully since FC4Test1 was released. Why anyone would still be teaching RHL9 is beyond me. It has been EOL'd for at least 2 years. The problem with Fedora Core is that whatever version you install it will be EOL'd within a year. It is gonna make it tough to stay current. The main purpose for FC is to get tings tested that might go into future versions of RHEL. A good portion of the features in FC3 made it into RHEL 4 which was released within the last 6 months. Things like selinux were tested during the FC2/FC3 release cycle and then intigrated into RHEL4. FC2's selinux support was such a disaster initally that it had to be disabled by default to get the release out. RHEL4 has a working selinux thanks to testing done on Fedora Core. > > I may be wrong, but RedHat pricing seemed cost prohibitive, > negating an advantage. There are academic discounts available if you qualify. IIRC something along the lines of $25.00/machine. You might want to call Red Hat to see what the requirements are. Like it or not the majority of linux jobs I have looked at want Red Hat experience. Since Novell aquired SuSe that might change over time but..... In addition as others have stated there are clones like cAos, Centos, Whitebox, Tao, Scientific linux, and the list goes on and on. They take the Red Hat SRPMS and build them into a distro. Some do minimal mods required to get things to build in their environment. Others do more extensive mods to bend things to fit their own specific needs. Depends on what you are looking for. HTH, Tom Diehl tdiehl@rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd123@rogueind.com ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|