Greg Lopp on 17 Jan 2006 15:24:57 -0000 |
Eric wrote: On Monday 16 January 2006 7:43 pm, Michael C. Toren wrote:I noticed from that routing table you dumped a few emails ago that eth0 was on both 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.0.0/24. Shouldn't that be 192.168.0.0/16 or at least 192.168.0.0.23 ? I'm not a networking expert (I just play one at work), but this looks like the sort of misconfiguration that would produce some unexpected behavior....unless I'm completely missing something - perhaps some ascii art of your network would help. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|