Jeff McAdams on 24 Feb 2006 00:25:18 -0000 |
Toby DiPasquale wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:24:09PM -0800, Marc Zucchelli wrote: >> I have a customer who was entertaining the notion of >> hosting his server in house. I talked him out of it, >> but I was curious about whether or not the bandwidth >> he could get would handle his site. He is able to get >> a business connection with 1Mbit upstream. >> 1Mbit = 1024bits * 1024bits = 1,048,576bits > 1Mbit == 1,000,000 bits per second > As such, 1Mbit => 125Kbytes/sec. > Network and disk are measured by powers of 10, not powers of 2 as you'd > expect. No, hard drives are frequently quoted in powers of 10...but that's hard drive vendors being dumb. Networks are basically *never* quoted in powers of 10. So Marc was correct in the 1024 * 1024. > A T1 is 1.54Mbit per second, over 150% faster than his current connection > (assuming he's got a symmetric connection). > 1.54Mbit/s => 192.5Kbytes/sec. At the risk of being pedantic... Its 1.544Mbit/s, but only 1.536Mbit/s is useable...the other 8kbit/s is used by the framing on the circuit. That's not so much to make a really noticeable difference, though. > Lots of people think that networking and disk are measured along powers > of 2 units, like RAM. I used to think that myself, but its not true. Check > the real number of bytes on your hard disk for some confirmation. Yeah, hard drive vendors are dumb...but networks still use powers of 2...basically universally. -- Jeff McAdams "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|