Jeff Abrahamson on 22 May 2006 14:42:44 -0000 |
<soapbox flavor="recent-revelation"> I've long been annoyed that mutt doesn't have a richer hook language (like something that's Turing complete, for example). In addition, the complexity that it does allow is hard to access, as the syntactic complexity increases at least as fast as the functional complexity of the task. Maybe some day we'll get a more interesting configuration language http://www.nongnu.org/mutt-guile/ but in the mean time, I realized that I can get around a lot of the complexity by using m4 to write my config files. The issue is that I want to be able to say things like, "plug is a mailing list, and mail to it should have the following six things set and mail from it should have the following four behaviors." But that gets to be a bother for list after list, person after person. I set things like signatures, my from address, pgp state, fcc and save folders, etc. With m4, it turns out to be very straight-forward to define a complicated looking macro (complicated only because of what mutt demands, not m4), and then I can say things like M_List(`.*phillylinux.org', `PLUG') and the M_List macros handles all the mutt statements I want associated with the list. This has made my configuration files much easier to read and understand, although I do have to remember to run make after editing them. </soapbox> -- Jeff Jeff Abrahamson <http://jeff.purple.com/> +1 215/837-2287 GPG fingerprint: 1A1A BA95 D082 A558 A276 63C6 16BF 8C4C 0D1D AE4B Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|