Jeff Abrahamson on 12 Jun 2006 15:55:29 -0000 |
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > [21 lines, 152 words, 1060 characters] Top characters: -etnisoa > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:35:14AM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson said: > > I want to allow direct smtp to my machine, but only from a limited set > > of hosts (who MX for me). Since exim4 is not linked against libwrap, > > I don't expect it to respect /etc/hosts.{deny,allow}, and it turns out > > that it doesn't when I try it. > > > > So I put exim4 in inetd.conf: > > > > smtp stream tcp nowait uucp /sbin/exim4 exim4 -bs > > This should probably be > smtp stream tcp nowait Debian-exim /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/exim4 exim4 -bs > > But isn't iptables and running exim as a daemon simpler? Yes, it surely is. I have switched back to running exim as a daemon. MCT proposed (previous email) not even bothering with the iptable rules. This seems reasonable to me barring problems in the future. So that's what I'm doing. I confirmed that I don't relay. -- Jeff Jeff Abrahamson <http://jeff.purple.com/> +1 215/837-2287 GPG fingerprint: 1A1A BA95 D082 A558 A276 63C6 16BF 8C4C 0D1D AE4B Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|