Dan Widyono on 30 Jul 2006 12:59:17 -0000 |
> However, if the data is in a very wide or deep tree (or a very, very large > number of files), be aware that rsync can have some very large memory > requirements, I wrote a wrapper for this issue. It dives into the tree one level (I could imagine making this variable, which can be set from command line) and rsync's each subdirectory. Otherwise rsync would keel over and die from the number of inodes it needed to handle (and this is *without* hard link analysis turned on!). Might be simple way for your 6-9TB transfers if you know how your trees are balanced (or if not, run a weekly analysis on the trees and output to a file, do the analysis before rsync runs, and rsync appropriately). Dan W. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|