|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
RE: [PLUG] are there any forbidden group names? or numbers?
|
actually, It seems ok.
I removed everyone from the group users, that had users as their primary group
the system still reports them as being in group users, and now my users lists
is much lower.
George
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
> [mailto:plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org]On Behalf Of Stephen Gran
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:47 AM
> To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org
> Subject: Re: [PLUG] are there any forbidden group names? or numbers?
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:37:45AM -0400, George Gallen said:
> > It's set for 32.
> >
> > George
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
> > > [mailto:plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org]On Behalf Of
> Stephen Gran
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 7:52 PM
> > > To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PLUG] are there any forbidden group names?
> or numbers?
> > >
> > >
> > > At any rate, if it was NGROUPS_MAX, you would run
> > > getconf NGROUPS_MAX
>
> Dude:
> steve@gashuffer:~$ getconf NGROUPS_MAX
> 65536
>
> You need a newer glibc :)
>
> I see that Debian stable has it set to 32 as well. I guess it's
> something that's been fixed upstream in the meantime, and just hasn't
> made it out the door into a release yet.
> --
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> | Stephen Gran | Mind your own business,
> then you don't |
> | steve@lobefin.net | mind mine.
> |
> | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve |
> |
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|