| Art Alexion on 14 Sep 2006 19:09:38 -0000 |
|
On Thursday 14 September 2006 09:49, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > While I understand posting your original message to the PLUG list, is > it really necessary to take up group bandwidth with these follow ups > that could be handled by e-mails between the two of you? CC'd to PLUG, with apologies... For some reason Kmail hiccups on this stuff. Original message to list. Conversation off-list (using "reply to sender"), then suddenly when I "reply" to a message sent directly to me only, the reply is addressed to the list. I don't notice it until I get a copy from the list. In fact, when I hit "reply" to Bhaskar's off-list comment to me, kmail popped up a reply addressed to the list. So back on topic, is this a kmail issue or a list configuration issue, i.e. is there a header telling kmail to reply to list on messages originally sent to the list, but then taken off-list? I looked at Bhaskar's headers and the list is not mentioned. -- _____________________________________________________________ Art Alexion Arthur S. Alexion LLC PGP fingerprint: 52A4 B10C AA73 096F A661 92D2 3B65 8EAC ACC5 BA7A The attachment - signature.asc - is my electronic signature; no need for alarm. Info @ http://mysite.verizon.net/art.alexion/encryption/signature.asc.what.html _____________________________________________________________ Attachment:
pgpZwFczFuogm.pgp ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|