sean finney on 29 Oct 2006 22:01:03 -0000 |
hi chris, On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 14:15 -0400, Chris Ross wrote: > I have been running VMWare for several years with with good success. > We ran some servers in VMs that were running ~100% processor > utilization all day long and they were quite stable. Before going to > Xen, I would like to see a better management interface. For a lower > level admin, Xen can be a bit problematic. VMWare has been really > easy to deal with fwiw, i just saw the following ITP[1] go through in debian which seemed somewhat relevant: > * Package name : xenman > Version : 0.5 > Upstream Author : Haphazard <haphazard1@users.sourceforge.net>, Jd <jd_jedi@users.sourceforge.net>, Yves Perrenoud <yves@xpand.org> > * URL : http://xenman.sourceforge.net/ > * License : GPL, LGPL > Programming Lang: Python > Description : A graphical Xen management tool > > XenMan is a Xen management tool with a GTK based graphical interface > that allows for performing the standard set of domain operations > (start, stop, pause, kill, shutdown, reboot, snapshot, etc...). It > also attempts to simplify certain aspects such as the creation of > domains, as well as making the consoles available directly within the > tool's user interface. but i haven't tried this myself. i also generally agree with your points. sean [1] ITP == "Intent to Package", a bug filed in the debian BTS. it's the first step towards bringing software into debian's main repository. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|