Matthew Rosewarne on 4 Mar 2007 21:22:55 -0000 |
On Sunday 04 March 2007 15:50, Walt Mankowski wrote: > You'll get some random entropy when you type in the command. > /dev/urandom will use that up and then use the kernel's random number > generator. I guess I don't understand why you think this radio scheme > is a better approach than that. The /dev/urandom approach is a lot > simpler and will have exactly the same effect of randomizing the disk. /dev/urandom is typically used for applications requiring data that "looks pretty random" (games and such), but for cryptographic purposes (such as making keys) /dev/random is the only way to get truly random data. While /dev/urandom is probably "good enough" for this purpose, the effect is _not_ the same. That said, /dev/urandom is much easier and probably adequately secure for most people who need to wipe a disk. I would normally use /dev/urandom if I were in any kind of hurry. I figured that I might as well try this approach not only because the results would be somewhat better, but also for Sir Edmund Hillary's reason. I may not be such a fan of ketchup, but I just can't stand rhubarb pie. Attachment:
pgpqdTMV6Lw1Y.pgp ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|