gabriel rosenkoetter on 9 Mar 2007 03:38:44 -0000 |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:23:12AM -0500, Dan Perez wrote: > We're still patching. Heck, IBM just released an updated patch for > Lotus Notes calendars last week... We still have to patch our RedHat > 2.1 servers and a couple of applications. Oh, cheer up. Microsoft still hasn't figured (as in, won't figure) out a patch for Exchange/Outlook that doesn't involve some (not all, apparently?) users who scheduled appointments with other people touching those objects to get the invitees calenders updated. At least with Notes, if you'd wanted to subject yourself to it, you could have written your OWN patches for this. > I definitely expect a few surprises, but I figure the impact will be > low. In the financial market (not mentioning any names... neither my employer nor their vendors/customers), the real unknown is how well the OTHER guy did. It doesn't matter if all my machines have the right time if they insisted 10 years ago that they'd transfer files at 01:15 Eastern daily, and they screwed up. Fault doesn't matter, it's still business lost. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgp8D4u2bjMhB.pgp ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|