K.S. Bhaskar on 9 Oct 2007 02:23:13 -0000 |
I agree with Matt that QEMU easier to use. When QEMU works, it works well and I try to use it. But QEMU has its own idiosyncrasies - not qemu itself which works well, but rather the kernel modules kqemu and kvm (depending on CPU capabilities), without which qemu runs too slowly to be useful except for demos. On my laptop kqemu works about 5% of the time. At other times, the virtuous machine hangs, repeatedly reboots or otherwise engages in less than useful behavior. I have both vmware and qemu virtual machines for those infrequent occasions when I must run XP, and have been fortunate that, I have never been at a point in time where neither QEMU nor vmware worked. Regards -- Bhaskar On 10/8/07, Matthew Rosewarne <mrosewarne@inoutbox.com> wrote: > Not to sound like a broken record, but it really is far easier to use QEMU, > which is already packaged. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|