zuzu on 17 Oct 2007 20:38:03 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] cultural ethics of email and spam

  • From: zuzu <sean.zuzu@gmail.com>
  • To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
  • Subject: Re: [PLUG] cultural ethics of email and spam
  • Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:37:52 -0400
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=krKf9mAk6satRHXDlvsNZuihkmjAxyHltooC8Unikm4=; b=cg+C46AQmZQiEk7u5vpF80zoWpJtkDPr3BbdPH17RVJYeyE46+Bq4iGpll0jKtad6J6zer1gGXjooOWp6AgcWxiJDHxe7HMIgAkbpqVdXZ/avsGrOXnhP0Y5RZnErEGveVl/KR6mDWgRr2qtV7uRB19u781KSXseJBFshhSkk00=
  • Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
  • Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org

On 10/17/07, Matt Ayres <matta@tektonic.net> wrote:
> zuzu wrote:
> >
> > without citing artificial restrictions, _bandwidth is bandwidth_.
> > really you're paying purely for Mbps with several "nines" of
> > availability, that's it.
> >
> If bandwidth is bandwidth then Verizon should just give everyone a
> 100/1000Mbit port and charge them 95th % usage on their circuit based on
> a $/Mbit price that is based on how much they will commit to (ranging
> from $30-125/Mbit).  This is method how hosting companies pay for
> transit. If this is how it worked for the consumer it'd be like going
> back to paying per minute on the telephone and would reduce peoples time
> spent online.

you're assuming that the cost of bandwidth is fixed, when competition
usually correlates to falling prices for all commodities -- bandwidth
included.

the problem with overbooking as a business model is alot like what
airlines have floundered with -- that seats are really commodities,
but the businesses want to fool people with phony differentiations
into thinking they're not, because they don't want to compete purely
on price/performance.

or simply put, "last mile" ISPs dug their own graves with overbooking
(aka underprovisioning) (on the heels of AOL) and now are suffering
because it's unsustainable.  this is where I lose my sympathy and
those businesses should fail and better businesses would take their
place.
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug