zuzu on 26 Oct 2007 20:30:19 -0000 |
On 10/26/07, Art Alexion <art.alexion@verizon.net> wrote: > On Thursday 25 October 2007 11:12:17 Sean C. Sheridan wrote: > > Many people may not understand that you may charge for your software and > > still have it fall under the category of "free software" > > I'm not sure I understand how that coexists with "The freedom to redistribute > copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2)." > > While a scenario may exist where entity A sells program-which-is-open-source, > but allows others to distribute it for free (or for a charge), that doesn't > seem like a real world scenario. > because selling copies of something which has a virtually zero cost of duplication is an incredibly foolish business model, unless you're appealing to government intervention/welfare in the form of copyright. selling "units" of a mass-produced item is a relic of a manufacturing economy. in a knowledge economy, it's selling the _creativity_ of _people_ that's the scarce/valuable commodity. instead of buying "things" we need to focus on buying "people" in the form of creative labor (vis-a-vis opportunity cost) to invent _new_ features and functionality. last I checked, your brain is the only one of its kind. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|