Re: [PLUG] Gutsy

On 10/26/07, JP Vossen < jp@jpsdomain.org> wrote:

> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:13:06 -0400
> From: "Brent Saner" < brent.saner@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PLUG] Gutsy
>
> and how does "aptitude clean" fit into this?

The same place that 'apt-get clean' or 'apt-get autoclean' fit.  Here's
the aptitude man page section, but the apt-get one says the same thing a
lot more verbosely:

clean
     Removes all previously downloaded .deb files from the package
     cache directory (usually /var/cache/apt/archives).

autoclean
     Removes any cached packages which can no longer be downloaded. This
     allows you to prevent a cache from growing out of control over time
     without completely emptying it.

IOW, these are run on the local client, to keep the local package cache
(/var/cache/apt/archives *.deb files) under control.  'apt-get
autoremove' (which I just noticed is not present in either tool in
Debian Etch, or in Gutsy 'aptitude') uninstalls packages that it thinks
are not needed any longer.  'deborphan' lists packages that it thinks
are not needed any longer, so you can feed that into your choice of
remove program.

Possibly aptitude doesn't have 'autoremove' because it already does that
all by itself, which is one of the reasons to use it instead?

> (it's always better to use aptitude than apt-get, in my opinion)

You are correct.  And it's not just your opinion, it's strongly
recommended by the Debian folks to use aptitude instead of apt-get or
dselect (sorry, can't find the citation right now, but here is one for
Ubuntu: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AptGetHowto ).  My problems
with that are as follows:

1) Force of habit (this is the main one :)
2) I find apt-get a LOT easier to type than aptitude for some reason
3) aptitude installs "recommended" packages by default, which I hate.
Yes, you can turn that off, and I do, but...

Later,
JP
----------------------------|:::======|-------------------------------
JP Vossen, CISSP            |:::======|        jp{at}jpsdomain{dot}org
My Account, My Opinions     |=========|       http://www.jpsdomain.org/
----------------------------|=========|-------------------------------
Microsoft has single-handedly nullified Moore's Law.
Innate design flaws of Windows make a personal firewall, anti-virus
and anti-malware software mandatory. The resulting software arms race
has effectively flattened Moore's Law on hardware running Windows.
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug