Matthew Rosewarne on 11 Dec 2007 04:36:23 -0000 |
On Monday 10 December 2007, Brent Saner wrote: > speaking as someone who is at his current place of employment BECAUSE of a > similar post a while back, and because job postings especially are > specifically sanctioned in the list guidelines, i'd really have to second > walt's motion that a job offer posted to the list is preferred to a flame > war any day of the week. Please guys, actually *read* people's posts before criticising them. Bhaskar did not take issue with someone posting a job offer to the list. He *did* take issue to that person not providing even a clue as to their identity (Name, employer, position, contact info, etc.). The most obvious reasons I can think of for not including that info are that the author is: A) inexperienced, and it was just an oversight B) sending spam, and does not want to be individually identified _____IN SHORT_____ Job offers -----> GOOD! Job offers with suspiciously-absent contact info -----> NOT-SO-GOOD! %!PS: Yes, I use "they" and "their" to talk about persons of unknown sex. English teachers are advised to bite my (shiny, metal) ass. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|