Dan Widyono on 8 Jan 2008 17:48:18 -0800 |
> The only problem with them, as far as I can see, is figuring out the sometimes > obscure syntax used in them. I have an overwhelming preference for config files which are well commented (and parsers which allow comments, of course -- parsers which do not, are just plain broken IMNSHO). Really large ones might need a "commented sample" version and a "just the options which are actually modified" version, for sanity and ease of understanding what was changed from defaults. Config parsers which allow "include" statements rock even farther. Dan W. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|