|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Anti-static vacuuming
|
Matthew Rosewarne wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008, JP Vossen wrote:
>> While I admit there is a theoretical danger, I've never been anything
>> but half-assed in my approach to dealing with static while working on
>> hardware and I've never had a problem. I've used whatever was handy:
>> regular canned air, my garage air compressor, and an assortment of
>> vacuum cleaners with no ill-effects I'm aware of.
>
> I would see it as a question of risk vs. benefit. There's a _very_ strong
> negative consequence for me if I manage to fry a machine or component, and a
> negligible benefit in using a vacuum cleaner over "canned air".
>
>
> %!PS: "canned air" isn't actually air, but rather a fluorocarbon gas such as
> difluoroethane, trifluoroethane, or tetrafluoroethane. These gasses don't
> cause nearly as much static buildup as air. Also, they're compressed into
> liquid form inside the can, so if you don't hold it upright while spraying,
> they will come out as a freezing-cold liquid instead of a gas.
... which will freeze a stinkbug like a rock thus reducing the odor - at least
until they thaw out in the garbage can _outside the house_!
Eric (who, like most people in this area of Pennsylvania, is suddenly plagued
with the smelly critters.)
--
# Eric Lucas
#
# "Oh, I have slipped the surly bond of earth
# And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings...
# -- John Gillespie Magee Jr
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|