K.S. Bhaskar on 27 Mar 2008 14:55:26 -0700 |
I use kvm / qemu+kqemu frequently. For console Linux guests, it's pretty fast. For Windows and GUI Linux, its performance leaves much to be desired, which suggests to me that it's not the virtualization per se that is slow but rather the graphics emulation. -- Bhaskar On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Matthew Rosewarne <mrosewarne@inoutbox.com> wrote: > On Thursday 27 March 2008, Art Alexion wrote: > > Without the kvm option, what are the recommendations among vmware, xen, > > virtualpc, parallels, qemu, etc. for the forgoing? > > You can use QEMU with KQEMU instead of KVM, which isn't quite as fast, but > there isn't a huge difference. There's also virtualbox-ose, but I'd try > qemu+kqemu first. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|