Matthew Rosewarne on 13 Sep 2008 13:52:13 -0700 |
On Saturday 13 September 2008, JP Vossen wrote: > Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that with > halfway modern hardware using ACPI and CPU scaling, this is just a waste > of power. Use the "blank" screen saver set to a few minutes, then turn > off the display totally in a few more minutes. Anything else is just > wasting power to a) run the display, b) crank up and run the CPU/GPU and > c) crank up the cooling to deal with the heat from the cranked CPU/GPUs. > Or is OpenGL not as CPU/GPU intensive as I remember? (I only ever use > the blank screen.) There is one screensaver that actually *is* useful: clock.kss (not sure if it's in xscreensaver), which displays a large clock on the screen. Other than that, I don't see the point of using anything but blank -> DPMS Off. > And as far as that goes, are screen "savers" even necessary anymore? > IIRC LCDs suffer a lot less from "burn-in" than did CRTs. Anyone know? Any modern CRT is largely immune to burn-in. Screensavers have been completely useless for years now. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|