James Barrett on 13 Sep 2008 16:14:47 -0700 |
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Matthew Rosewarne <mrosewarne@inoutbox.com> wrote: > > Any modern CRT is largely immune to burn-in. Screensavers have been > completely useless for years now. > Correct me if I am wrong, but don't plasma displays suffer from burn-in? I agree, screensavers are useless for typical displays and average situations. xscreensaver is very useful for locking my laptop and displaying the time or some other information, but that is about as far as it goes. Maybe screensavers will become the 'appendix' of computer systems in a few decades. People might ask "Why did my machine come with this useless thing? It does not seem to have any function, but it must be here for a reason. What was the original purpose? Was it evolutionary, and somehow helped when the system was becoming mature years ago? My system operates flawlessly without it, but nothing is harmed by keeping it intact. We might as well just leave it and remove it if it becomes a problem..." -- Jim ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|