Christopher M. Jones on 13 Sep 2008 15:04:44 -0700 |
Wisdom is to stick with nVidia. Their cards -are- better supported, the ATI drivers are generally considered way inferior to the proprietary nVidia drivers. And if you ever get interested in running something like Linux MCE, then you'll -have- to have nVidia to get the gl support. You might also want GL for those cool desktop effects, like the rotating cube in compiz. Anyway, I used a 5200 FX for ages. Still do, in my 'work' machine. My myth box runs an 8600GT, and I've been nothing but happy. Casey Bralla wrote: > I'm looking for a recommendation for a new video card. > > I'm not a gamer, so don't need anything close to bleeding edge. I want to be > able to have groovy GL screen savers, but other than that, I can stay 2D. > > I've got an old nVidia card, which has worked fine with the closed source > nVidia drivers, but is broken for X.org 1.5. (The most recent nVidia drivers > support x 1.5, but my card is not supported by the latest drivers.) In the > meantime, I'm using the open source "nv" drivers, which are pretty poor. > > I'm thinking of doing 2 things: > > 1. Nothing. Wait for nVidia to back-port Xorg 1.5 compatibility to the older > cards. > > 2a. Buy a new, low cost nVidia-based card > 2b. Buy a new, low cost ATI-based card > > > I've heard that ATI is aggressively supporting open source, which is very > nice. However, my experience is that ATI has better "promise" than actual > performance. nVidia, on the other hand, has been very poor with open source, > but their proprietary drivers are excellent. > > > Anybody have any suggestions? > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|