Michael Leone on 24 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0700 |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Art Alexion <art.alexion@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> They're copiers, with a scanning capability, not OCR scanners. Usually, >> anyway. > > Well, yes, but what is less obvious is why bother encapsulating the image in a > PDF. I suppose it is so that multiple pages, each a separate image, can be > consolidated into a single container file. But doesn't the TIFF format > already incorporate this? More people have PDF readers than a TIFF viewer? Or (more likely) they figure a TIFF would lead people to think it's an image, and not a document. An end user doesn't give a darn that the PDF is actual an encapsulated JPG; to them, they have a non-editable version of a document (which is usually all they need). And documents need PDF Reader. A TIFF is a picture, not a document. A document is not an image. QED :-) (to them, anyway, even if - effectively - it's the same thing) And doing that solves the problem for the majority. Congratulations; once again, you are in the minority, just like using Linux. Unique Art, that's what they'll call you. LOL ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|