Michael Leone on 20 Feb 2009 12:16:39 -0800 |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Jeff Bailey <skydiver38@comcast.net> wrote: > I'd be interested in learning why ext3 is a poor choice as well... Actually, it was me who said to Adam that I thought ext3 was perhaps not the best choice for such a large external drive. (I never said "poor"). I was wondering if a different journaling system would be more appropriate, for speed mostly, and also perhaps for size of partition. I said I thought I had heard that one of the other choices (such as XFS) might be better. Not ResierFS, which I personally had problems with in the past, and I am unsure of it's continued development). So it was more of a question than a pronouncement. I've been told that ext3 is ext2 with journalling added in. And perhaps using a FS designed from the start as a journalling system would be a better choice. -- Michael J. Leone, <mailto:turgon@mike-leone.com> PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Photo Gallery: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeleonephotos> P. J. O'Rourke - "Everybody knows how to raise children, except the people who have them." ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|