K.S. Bhaskar on 20 May 2009 12:49:08 -0700 |
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Greg Helledy <gregsonh@gra-inc.com> wrote: [KSB] <...snip...> >> If you don't have physical security, you don't have security. >> >> Paul > > > I don't see why this is such a big deal from the security perspective. > I can already use any Live CD to copy anything I like from (or anything > I like onto) a system I have access to. I suppose the difference would > be that this gets around the protection of encrypted partitions. [KSB] That's why if you lose a laptop, and then find it later, you shouldn't boot the on-disk OS, even if you have encrypted partitions. Boot with a known-good live CD, recover the data from the encrypted partitions, and then install a new OS. I suppose if I were really paranoid, I'd put the drive on another laptop and recover it there, in case the recovered laptop has a BIOS virus or a manipulated disk controller. If I were really, really, paranoid, even with the drive on another laptop, I suppose I could be concerned that they might have used dd to replicate the contents to another drive with doctored drive electronics. But then, I don't work for the No Such Agency. -- Bhaskar ("they're out to make me look paranoid") ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|