Art Clemons on 10 Jul 2009 11:07:35 -0700 |
> Still, ndiswrapper is quite elegant at least in it's purpose. Perhaps saving > the Linux community from a serious temporary problem (or making them (me) lazy?). I think you're ignoring the argument over whether or not ndiswrapper taints the kernel since it loads propietary code. There was at least some suggestion that since ndiswrapper itself was GPL, a new policy was justified by ndiswrapper. I lost track of the argument since I stopped using ndiswrapper. I originally considered the consideration of taint moot, but after seeing Microsoft sue over using long names with VFAT, in hindsight, worry over taint isn't moot. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|