microlaser on 17 Jul 2009 17:45:45 -0700


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] Linux vs. PC-BSD as a desktop OS?


I ran openbsd on an old blue and white powermac with kde3 and it recognized the wireless card and installed ports with ease.  It was a nice alternative to running an old version of macos and was zippy as a desktop with only 640 megs ram.  *bsd can make a nice desktop os.   Openbsd is minimal so you can install only the packages you want.

-----Original Message-----

From:  brent timothy saner <brent.saner@gmail.com>
Subj:  Re: [PLUG] Linux vs. PC-BSD as a desktop OS?
Date:  Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:00 pm
Size:  1K
To:  gregsonh@gra-inc.com; Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greg Helledy wrote:
> I've been using linux as a desktop OS since 2002, Debian stable since 
> Woody.  Periodically, I read things about how great the BSDs are. 
> PC-BSD seems to be a "distro" of FreeBSD, aimed at filling the desktop 
> role.  The reviews tend to focus on the iffy ease-of-use of KDE4, rather 
> than the overall usability and maintainability of the system (I'm a KDE3 
> user so I guess I'll face this sooner or later anyway).
> 
> Has anyone used PC-BSD or FreeBSD as a desktop?  Any major pluses or 
> minuses vs. Debian?  This isn't really linux so maybe it's better kept 
> off-list.  Thanks,
> Greg
> 
> 
> 


well, PC-BSD is a "distro" of *BSD. FreeBSD is also a "distro" of *BSD.
they're not meant to be hierarchical, they're meant to be forks.

that being said, PC-bsd has shady hardware support but it's a lot easier
install/setup/ freebsd has a wider supported hardware base and is one of
the best maintained *bsd's, but it's a bit tricky if you're new to bsd.

personally, i prefer openbsd but that's because i tend to only use bsd
on servers or network appliances (routers, firewalls, etc.).

bsd is still lacking pretty far behind in the desktop area, in my opinion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkphEIcACgkQ8u2Zh4MtlQpEswCgvu9vP9Aiu8WrKwx/tuq9vdUZ
l0gAoMrV/xDsLmQumnyHwvXnBcmPLEBq
=Ux20
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

--- message truncated ---

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug