Casey Bralla on 30 Jul 2009 17:29:15 -0700 |
I ask this question from 2 vantage points: 1) Legal; and 2) Moral The supreme court has famously ruled that it is perfectly legal to record TV and radio broadcast off the air (and I presume, off cable). This strikes me as being both legally sound, and morally defensible. I pay for cable service and am forced to watch commercials as payment for the pleasure of listening to and recording the shows. But how about for a streaming music service that states in their accompanying documentation that it is not legal to record the stream (due to licensing issues), even though you pay for the privilege of listening to the stream? I don't know the law in this case, but it strikes me as morally acceptable to record the stream, especially as I will pay for the stream listening rights. Further, the situation seems so analogous to over-the-air recording as to be silly to even differentiate it. But, I frankly don't feel entirely comfortable with this position and would welcome the opinions of other rampant moralizers. BTW, I don't feel any strong moral obligation to comply with an immoral or unjust law, although I do tend to minimize the likelihood that something bad will happen to me if I do so. Or in other words, I'm all for Civil Disobedience, but I'm a coward and don't want to spend the night in j -- Casey Bralla Chief Nerd in Residence The NerdWorld Organisation http://www.NerdWorld.org ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|