Lee Marzke on 26 Sep 2009 15:29:36 -0700 |
Art Alexion wrote: > On Monday 21 September 2009 15:58:48 JP Vossen wrote: > >> Related (I haven't had time to read any of the articles yet): >> >> http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/09/19/0023216/WiMax-In-2010-mdash-Too-L >> ittle-Too-Late MobileWiMax In 2010 — Too Little, Too Late? >> Posted by Soulskill on Saturday September 19, @05:09AM >> from the that-only-gives-it-two-years dept. >> >> CWmike writes "By the end of 2010, users in more than 80 US cities may >> be able to ditch their cable modems, T1 setups and DSL lines — and the >> Wi-Fi routers that go with them — in favor of WiMax wireless technology. >> > > I couldn't help thinking during the presentation that WiMax was great for > people who currently use cellular modems, and possibly people who don't want > to pay Barnes & Noble, etc. for WiFi access, but pointless at home or in the > office. > > When they were showing the home modems, no one addressed the question, "why > should I dump cable/DSL/FiOS for a slower, less stable wireless alternative > at about the same price?" > > I have DSL from speakeasy 1.5Mb/256Kb , 2 static IP's and they don't block and ports and are server friendly. That uplink speed with both servers and VOIP is problematic. I can't get anything faster on the uplink because of my distance from the CO, so the only option is business FIOS for about $110/month. So yes if Clearwire really is reliable I would consider it. Lee ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|