Matt Mossholder on 10 Oct 2009 14:45:33 -0700 |
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 17:21 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > More interesting was the belief that email was so small, relative to other > internet traffic, that increased bandwidth and storage demands, were not > worth getting concerned about. > > Anyone here who has ever administered an email server knows how silly these > beliefs are. But we live in a world where these seem to be the "conventional > wisdom" -- and though we know that conventional wisdom is, by its nature, > usually wrong -- it is a reality we must live with. You know, I just had a thought about this... why isn't HTML email compressed with gzip compression, like many web browsers/servers do today. Most text compresses very well, and HTML certainly does. As long as there is a defined mime type for it, such that MTAs can still do spam filtering, etc. , it should work pretty well, I would think. --Matt ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|