|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] RedHat - chkconfig question
|
- From: Doug Stewart <zamoose@gmail.com>
- To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] RedHat - chkconfig question
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:21:12 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vpyTd58XOSikQdWSKOuEpTSSidR35WKClolO+7I5lPI=; b=iu5T/9tL9zPFc8EXsSSAkrGvmgivmJGAsjALUeU6M1cLMgmKJcNflkZeOjE28AOf7f csey9kUSVss+YF5N4lQddldSk39eo3dd7AO5pz0yefAU+WkikBEqr1ZyggBcaPFhDUZk XX4gfl6k0K0QfynhDuEXA9IFLX2+VqYDwfBIA=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
I guess I was running off old information -- the closest anyone seemed
to have was sysv-rc-conf, e.g.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=190464
Thanks for the heads-up.
On 8/4/10, JP Vossen <jp@jpsdomain.org> wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:59:49 -0400
> > From: Doug Stewart
>>
>> chkconfig is absolutely one of the things I miss most when shackled to
>> a Debian[-based] system. I still can't seem to fully grok how Debian
>> handles services...
>
> I used to like 'ntsysv' on Red Hat systems, which is an idiot-proof
> curses-based on/off console app. 'rcconf' is the closest I've found to
> that on Debuntu.
>
> So in addition to the 'sudo aptitude install chkconfig' someone else
> already wisely suggested, 'sudo aptitude install rcconf' might be of
> interest.
>
> Any Debian/Ubuntu devs care to chime in with the (cough) canonical way
> to do this kind of thing in .debs or otherwise?
>
> Thanks,
> JP
> ----------------------------|:::======|-------------------------------
> JP Vossen, CISSP |:::======| http://bashcookbook.com/
> My Account, My Opinions |=========| http://www.jpsdomain.org/
> ----------------------------|=========|-------------------------------
> "Microsoft Tax" = the additional hardware & yearly fees for the add-on
> software required to protect Windows from its own poorly designed and
> implemented self, while the overhead incidentally flattens Moore's Law.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
--
-Doug
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|