Jason Stelzer on 17 Sep 2010 05:01:19 -0700 |
Well, there's a couple things going on there. The first thing is that there are a ton of lines of boiler plate packaging code. The more important thing is that centos moves heaven and earth to NOT break the kernel ABI when it upgrades. This is a GOOD thing IMO. But I'm also one of those dirty, dirty, non-'foss only' types. Out of curiosity I took a look and it turns out that the 'official' way to build a kernel is pretty well documented by centos. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel If you dispensed with a modular kernel, then most of the stuff they have is not very interesting to you. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, JP Vossen <jp@jpsdomain.org> wrote: > Jason and Kevin suggested looking at the CentOS kernel spec file. ÂGreat > thought, I have only this to say: > > $ mkdir kernel && cd $_ > $ wget > 'http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum/pub/centos/5.5/os/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.18-194.el5.src.rpm' > Â# 79M > $ rpm2cpio kernel-2.6.18-194.el5.src.rpm | cpio -i > $ wc -l kernel-2.6.spec > 17361 kernel-2.6.spec > -- J. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|