Austin Murphy on 8 Oct 2010 07:03:20 -0700 |
I think the Beta label comes from the process of integrating the backlog of patches from GO-OO and elsewhere. The internal sun/oracle OO.o team was not especially welcoming of patches and a lot have piled up. I imagine that once these get integrated, the beta label will be dropped. Austin On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Art Alexion <art.alexion@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like the core OOo team has split from Oracle, renaming OOo > LibreOffice, and the OOo website to thedocumentfoundation.org. > The OOo website makes no mention of Libre Office, but LibreOffice has a faq > that leaves as many practical questions unanswered as it answers many of the > organizational ones. For instance, where other parts of the web site claim > that LO is a rebranding and built on the OOo code base, the download page > describes it as Beta software, and warns about use in a production > environment. > Has anyone tried LO? > Are there regressions that make it less stable than OOo? > Will OOo still be developed under Oracle's umbrella? > Do the leading distros have plans to replace OOo with LO? > I've been using one form or another of this suite since StarOffice 5.2, and > would appreciate any insights. > > -- > artAlexion > sent unsigned from webmail interface > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|