Art Alexion on 20 Oct 2010 06:15:08 -0700 |
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Richard Freeman <r-plug@thefreemanclan.net> wrote: > > On 10/19/2010 08:35 AM, Eric H. Johnson wrote: > > You are correct on both points, it was me that said that and USB devices > > cannot be used for hard real-time. PCI based parallel port boards often can > > work, but that is little help when dealing with a laptop having neither a > > parallel port nor PCI bus. > Honestly, if you're interested in real-time, then an OS designed for > this should be used. I think linux can be used in this capacity, but in > some cases there are better tools for the job. > > In theory a PC can be a good realtime platform. A realtime OS would > probably start by ditching the BIOS completely (just wipe out the IDT > and write your own low-level routines). Realtime operations really > requires a bare-hardware level of engineering. > The problem isn't just real time, but we have a number of switches that can only be configured via a serial connection. And it is much more cumbersome to do this via desktops and servers than a laptop we can carry to the rack mounted switch. -- artAlexion sent unsigned from webmail interface ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|