JP Vossen on 24 Nov 2010 12:09:50 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Virtualization for small system? |
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 04:33:18 -0500 From: Richard Freeman<r-plug@thefreemanclan.net> On 11/23/2010 08:16 AM, Art Alexion wrote:> 1. VBox will run a 64 bit windows guest on a 32 bit Linux host ... > but very poorly. Don't bother with it.
One more that I'll add - I can't vouch for 32-bit hosts, but virtualbox will not run 64-bit guests on a 64-bit host unless it has hardware virtualization support. Most CPUs sold in the last few years have this, but if you have an older system you're probably out of luck.
And even when the CPU supports it, the BIOS has to a) support it and b) be enabled. I've seen various forum posts that claim the former, and I've run into the latter, where a brand new box had it disabled in the BIOS out-of-the-box. I simple reboot and BIOS tweak fixed it, but ruined my uptime. :-)
* Is my CPU VT capable $ egrep '^flags.*(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo ### Any output = yes Related: * Is my CPU 64-bit (64bit)$ [ "$(grep flags /proc/cpuinfo | grep -wo 'lm' | sort -u)" = 'lm' ] && { echo '64-bit'; } || { echo '32-bit'; }
Later, JP ----------------------------|:::======|------------------------------- JP Vossen, CISSP |:::======| http://bashcookbook.com/ My Account, My Opinions |=========| http://www.jpsdomain.org/ ----------------------------|=========|------------------------------- "Microsoft Tax" = the additional hardware & yearly fees for the add-on software required to protect Windows from its own poorly designed and implemented self, while the overhead incidentally flattens Moore's Law. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug