Re: [PLUG] recompiling a kernel for performance

Claude M. Schrader on 7 Dec 2010 12:50:53 -0800

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] recompiling a kernel for performance

From: "Claude M. Schrader" <plug@claudeschrader.com>
To: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PLUG] recompiling a kernel for performance
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:50:47 -0500
Mail-followup-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i

On 18:56 Mon 06 Dec     , Mag Gam wrote:
> Regarding jumboframes, do I have to make the switch on the
> client side or switch side ?

If I'm not mistaken, Jumbo Frames need to be implented at every node:
Client, Server, and all the switches in between.
Claude
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

References:
- [PLUG] recompiling a kernel for performance
  - From: Mag Gam <magawake@gmail.com>
- Re: [PLUG] recompiling a kernel for performance
  - From: Austin Murphy <austin.murphy@gmail.com>
- Re: [PLUG] recompiling a kernel for performance
  - From: Mag Gam <magawake@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PLUG] SKYNET
Next by Date: [PLUG] External drive casing for EIDE HD
Previous by thread: Re: [PLUG] recompiling a kernel for performance
Next by thread: Re: [PLUG] recompiling a kernel for performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread