Adam Zion on 9 Dec 2011 07:57:02 -0800
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Lost gigabytes?
|
- From: Adam Zion <azion1995@gmail.com>
- To: PLUG <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] Lost gigabytes?
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:56:57 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lszv7Ea+IM95avN82tW9dXN29SVMGX4ig/BFftENj9Q=; b=JfUlsHVNDY3Qz0V69niAoX6en/fZgTiQauAZ0j+VWxhlx6Sm3cWBLXhR3U8/Y1EqoD MMX0IqSFwCjoUqkqzy+ZUSdUztlNGLZQCj+T/p77KzIr/OLHRsOL67CSzfRLiryhfBqr hqPLLRGgrpLVD4x6R43ZZY2bIoqq750bWC4ME=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
> And now all becomes clear. You're using LVM.
>
> Run:
> vgs
> lvs
OK, that shows me the actual size of the partitions. Here's what I get from those commands:
[adam@adam-fedora-ntbk ~]$ sudo vgs
VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree
vg_adamfedorantbk 1 3 0 wz--n- 134.97g 0
LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% Convert
lv_home vg_adamfedorantbk -wi-ao 80.22g
lv_root vg_adamfedorantbk -wi-ao 50.00g
lv_swap vg_adamfedorantbk -wi-ao 4.75g
I got conky to do so by configuring it as so:
${color yellow}/${color white} ${fs_free_perc /}% free$alignr${fs_used /}/${fs_size /} - ${FS_FREE /}
${color yellow}/home${color white} ${fs_free_perc /home}% free$alignr${fs_used /home}/${fs_size /home} - ${FS_FREE /home}
${color yellow}C:${color white} ${fs_free_perc /media/C-Drive}% free$alignr${fs_used /media/C-Drive}/${fs_size /media/C-Drive} - ${FS_FREE /media/C-Drive}
In case you're not familiar w/conky (which you should be- it's a brilliant system monitor), the first line checks the free space percentage, space used, total space, and space available on root, the 2nd those on home, and the third on the Windows partition (I need 1 WIndows PC for grad work). So, now, at least, I know where the space is.
> I think LVM is pretty safe (when growing fileysstems at least, I never bother
> with shrinking them), though yes, at least understand the cmdline options
> that you're passing to lvresize as it would be awful to think you're
> growing a certain number of extents but instead be providing the new
> absolute size.
Just to confirm: this is a good, stable, arrangement, yes? Is
there any disadvantage to leaving this configuration as-is vs.
reformatting it differently?
-Z
--
Adam+Zion, MCSE+I, Registered Linux User #471910
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug