|Julien Vehent on 14 Dec 2011 07:29:53 -0800|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [PLUG] observational: user hostility|
On 2011-12-14 10:08, jeff wrote:
Whenever I used to do anything with graphics, back before linux, I'd openPhotoshop (largely because I had it). Do not construe usership with abilitythough...Yesterday I wanted to do a tiny amount of graphic manipulation so I fired up GIMP. To say I'm not a power user is an understatement. In fact, it's likegiving me a Ferrari when I drive a land yacht. No matter how I tried, I could not do what I wanted. I called over acoworker, who does graphics, for help. She had that same sideways stare: itwas the blind leading the stupid.Not wishing to take a course in GIMP, I found a program for the Other OS, in which I finally managed to do what I wanted (put a Santa hat on my dog). My coworker said it would have been easier to put an actual hat on the dog andtake a picture.I am not blaming GIMP nor promoting anything else. Just seems that the other program was less user-hostile (to the way I do things). Might just be thatI'm a graphical nincompoop....But when you gotta put a Santa hat on your dog, you gotta put a Santa hat onyour dog. No amount of manual-scanning will do.
I found both photoshop and gimp to be equally frustrating from a beginner's perspective.
After a while, and a few dozens pictures/photos manipulation with gimp, I'd say it's an excellent tool for the job.
Question is: up to what point can you really make complicated things user-friendly ? I wouldn't expect to know how to drive a ferrari without taking at least one driving lesson. Same goes, I think, with most evolved software.
-- Julien Vehent - http://1nw.eu/!j ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug