Alan D. Salewski on 14 Apr 2012 18:38:13 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Mosh |
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 05:55:37PM -0400, Casey Bralla spake thus: > Anybody tried Mosh yet? it looks to be a "screen" replacement. I was not > able to get a connection between 2 machines running Arch and Gentoo (mostly > for lack of trying), but am wondering if it is any better than screen. > > Anybody tried it? > -- > > Casey Bralla Not yet, but since versions of it are so easily available in debian (both wheezy and sid), I will be soon(ish). My (quick) read of the man page and the project site[0] is that it is intended more as a replacement for interactive ssh client sessions rather than a replacement for screen[1], and that it would actually be useful to run instead of ssh within screen sessions where you do not have a permanent connection to the remote machine. Rather than lose your interactive session when disconnected (as would be the case with ssh), when you get a new connection (from perhaps a different location), mosh will try to re-synchronize your client-side session with the still-live server side session that was never shut down. I, too, would be interested in hearing if anyone has experience using mosh. -Al [0] http://mosh.mit.edu/ [1] Though if you're looking for alternatives to screen, lots of people say good things about tmux: http://tmux.sourceforge.net/ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- a l a n d. s a l e w s k i salewski@att.net 1024D/FA2C3588 EDFA 195F EDF1 0933 1002 6396 7C92 5CB3 FA2C 3588 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug