Jack Hill on 20 Jun 2012 18:41:52 -0700

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] Recommend: cheap server suitable for virtualization?

On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:55:59 -0400
Rich Freeman <r-plug@thefreemanclan.net> wrote:

> Not all Atom chips support VT-X, which is important to consider when
> using as a host.

Virtualization extensions are not necessary, however, for Xen paravirt.
I actually prefer AMD boards these days as they are friendlier to
CoreBoot (I believe that they are also more generous with
virtualization extensions on their low-end chips.) I know a couple
people with HP ProLiant MicroServers [0] who quite like them.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug