Rich Freeman on 31 Jul 2012 03:52:20 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] DCANET response |
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Sam Gleske <sam.mxracer@gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunate. And unfortunately so long as there is two or three companies > that still provide internet then they can't be slapped with an antitrust > suit so it's unlikely we'll ever have the upper hand with this kind of > corporate bullying. Sure they can - it is "antitrust" - not "antimonopoly". A single company isn't a trust, although the law applies to monopolies as well. The problem is that the collusion isn't overt, and there is a lack of political will to enforce the law. I think I've already posted my thoughts on the subject - break up the vertical integration and have the lines owned by a utility with heavy regulation that operates on a cost-plus system and only transmits the signals to the CO. If the telecom makes the same money with ISP A vs B and isn't an ISP themselves, then they have incentive to provide the best service to all. Rich ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug