Art Clemons on 14 Aug 2012 11:49:26 -0700
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[PLUG] Two Factor Authentication
|
- From: Art Clemons <artclemons@aol.com>
- To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: [PLUG] Two Factor Authentication
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:49:17 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1344970158; bh=S+Q4FJnfoj3iZH/laT7iaiKJBqmUGKuJZ79ww4oMJYc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VgGurdQAXMa4w1XGhnunMU3ddUouIB7HzbbDjz+Bvi2Q5UeAEEZsllJ7tBylAzRvk wViIgZiLIT/SjCUaGGSrX+ubWpGuPmi8CYUWQm87usdyShodPbd2qf7JNFqmQjf8Xm XyzmbtoRstHCMS1T9X+JEScNDESAlyUnWisp4S/A=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0
I noticed the following on howtogeek. I wonder how reliable Google's
setup is for what amounts to a really occasional connection. Anyone
know of a better technique or of possible security holes. I for example
wonder about the rate limiting authentication reliability or the
emergency authentication to allow authentication with no cell phone.
<http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/>
http://preview.tinyurl.com/92ho62d
http://tinyurl.com/92ho62d
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug